Light, mine, mirror, say…

Annotation

Here, using the example of an ordinary mirror, we present a way out of the impasse in which science finds itself, considering time to be an objective reality within the framework of the only one formation (Creation).



A lot of things are told about wonderful properties of a mirror. And here the main miracle of a mirror still remains hidden though every person knows that in it sees itself.
It is possible to ask a question: nevertheless, why a person learns himself in a mirror?
Put a mirror before any other living being – a monkey, a cow, a dog, - it either will turns away indifferently, or will try to fight with the reflection, or will be frightened of it. True, primates or elephants can spin around in front of it, as a kind of assistant, in order to quickly find a place to scratch, but without understanding what kind of object is in front of them, and immediately forget about it, thereby not highlighting themselves with the help of a mirror as a self-made personality.
What is the secret here?
And further. People are afraid of a mirror, closing it after of death of close people, probably, believing that a world behind the looking-glass is related with otherworldly. Indeed, a mirror reflects our lively and "warm" world as flat, cold and incorporeal.
However, this property of a mirror can give the answer to many questions if to present that the division by a surface of a mirror of our world from a world behind the looking-glass is a hint, a kind of analog of Creation, which is not an only one, but a duality.
Parmenides thought of this in Greece 2500 years ago, believing the true Creation in the form of a timeless, motionless sphere (Uniform), and all round us as only seeming. For a similar approach he still is exposed to criticism and sneers.
Nevertheless, Parmenides tried to prove that beingness is one thing, that there is no motion in it, there is no origination and destruction: “… it is universal, existing alone, immovable and without end; nor ever was it nor will it be, since it now is, all together, one, and continuous” [1, p. 37-39]. Regarding the world in which we are, then he put it so: “It is necessary to say and to think that What is; for it is to be/ but nothing it is not. These things I bid you ponder. / For I shall begin for you from this first way of inquiry,/ then yet again from that along which mortals who know nothing/ wander two-headed: for haplessness in their/ breasts directs wandering understanding. They are borne along/ deaf and blind at once, bedazzled, undiscriminating hordes/ who have supposed that it is and is not the same/ and not the same; but the path of all these turns back on itself” [1, p. 37-39]. That is, he believed this world is the seeming world of opinions and senses.
It is necessary to tell that Parmenides's idea about beingness as the uniform, eternal and motionless, which seems absurd, actually can explain a lot of things in existence, if to assume that the except an eternal and infinite Uniform there is not seeming, but quite the material, real world in time which is united indissolubly with an eternal Uniform in a certain sustainable system, both components which support each other.
To assume this, of course, possible, but it would be desirable to receive the answer to a question: how functions this system?
Beingness, if to see under it everything existing, or existing formations, can't be manifested in the case of absence in it of consciousness in any way.
In this regard, Parmenides is completely right.
In other words, if the consciousness was not, as such, then and beingness there would not be - there would be nothing, more precisely, everything would be in nothingness. This fact is, apparently, the primary cause of the appearance in human consciousness of the concept of God-creator.
The first of philosophers this ratio between consciousness and things quite distinctly, albeit in his own way, understood Berkeley: “IV. It is indeed an Opinion strangely prevailing amongst Men, hat Houses, Mountains, Rivers, and in a word all sensible Objects have an Existence Natural or Real, distinct from their being perceived by the Understanding. But with how great an Assurance and Acquiescence soever this principle may be entertained in the World; yet whoever shall find in his Heart to call it in Question, may, if I mistake not, perceive it to involve a manifest Contradiction. For what are the forementioned Objects but the things we perceive by Sense, and what do we perceive besides our own Ideas or Sensations; and is it not plainly repugnant that any one of these or any Combination of them should exist unperceived?” [2, p. 13].
Since that time, much has changed, in particular, holography was discovered, which, as will be shown below, will be very appropriate in the development of Parmenides' ideas.
Group of physicists under the direction of Alain Aspect at the Parisian university in 1982 was revealed that in particular conditions the elementary particles, for example, electrons, are able to instantly communicate with one another regardless of the distance between them. In other words, each particle knows always that another does, irrespective of distance between them. On this experimental basis the theory of the holographic Universe was developed. Any particle of this Universe is a holographic projection of the single reality. It has been assumed, as a corollary of this theory, that the physical density of the world is holographic frequency setting, and, in particular, that the person is the hologram.
The physicist of the London University David Bohm deduces the main postulate out of this experiment: "The new form of comprehension probably can be called the Inseparable Wholeness in Flowing Motion". This point of view means that the stream, in any sense, precedes "things", whose origin and dissolution happens in this stream. Bohm notes that "each relatively self-contained and steady structure has to be understood not as something independently and constantly existing, but rather as the derivative, given rise in complete motion of the stream and, eventually, dissolving in same stream. That, how it is generated, and how it maintains its existence, therefore, depends on its local function within the stream"[3].
The hologram itself is a high-frequency formation as a product of the superimposition of several coherent waves, which gives a stationary interference pattern, since the phase difference of the waves does not change.
If to unite the infinite and timeless of Parmenides, comprising in itself everything, but in no way separately not manifested (Uniform) not with beingness directly, but with a holographic projection of Uniform in which infinity is torn, then the similar duality gives time, and eventually - beingness.
Recognition of unicity of Creation which takes place so far both in science and in religion means emergence of a number of the unsolvable problems, in particular - the problem of God, the beginning and the end of Creation, a problem of time, a problem of objectivity of the world surrounding a person, a problem of emergence of a person, all living, etc.
All attempts to resolve these problems weren't crowned with success till our time, and the German philosopher Kant even coined the term "thing in itself" (a transcendental object) [4], into use, having designated by it, in effect, our helplessness in determining of a difference between manifested to us and the basis of Creation, outside of our sensations.
Below you will see that the duality of Creation in the form of a timeless and infinite Uniform and its temporary holographic projection allows solving quite adequately many problems which are still not resolved.
For simplification we use a smooth surface of a mirror as a notional partition separating the two different "light".
As it is paradoxical, but the specularity is reflection of circumstance, which is not representable for most of people, namely: that each thing, that is present in front of them in a certain form, however, does not have this form in its frequency-information basis.
In other words, each thing originally is not such dense matter, which in the form of a certain object appears in beingness, for example, in front of the mirror. Any subject in front of the mirror is the information copy of what is in Uniform; this copy is converted in consciousness of the person to the dense object which thus does not exist independently, that clearly demonstrates ambiguity of any object of beingness.
The mirror here demonstrates the reverse process of transformation of a dense object in its information a copy in through the looking glass. The object, which is in front of the mirror, thereby is doubled, being manifested in two different forms, and this clearly demonstrates its ambiguity.
Exactly this property of a mirror frightens people, directing them to thoughts on the afterworld in the looking-glass.
Along with that, the conditional separation by a mirror of the live world with the "lifeless" behind the looking-glass shows the possibility of life and development only in the world with things, time, space, motion which, being derivative of a holographic projection, nevertheless, makes a true field for development of consciousness in the conditions of the resisting environment.
The aforesaid clearly shows secondariness of beingness known to us, secondariness of objects which can be manifested only by consciousness and arise in consciousness in the form of beingness. But the consciousness can't do without such thingness beingness.
Besides, a holographic projection shows that consciousness is not function of a brain, on the contrary, a brain is controlled by consciousness, more precisely, the brain is its tool, and the consciousness, thus, in case of the destruction of a brain doesn't perish.
Existence of a holographic projection shows also absence of non-material objects, inasmuch the projection is wave structure, and, so all, proceeding from it. there are as these or those forms of a matter, including any things, any types of consciousness, thought, feeling etc.
The very same individual consciousness in a person, for example, via reflection at the mirror surface can always determine oneself as the only living being from all known, conscious of oneself as the personality, which, thanks to self-consciousness is separated partly from own surrounding, is capable of developing according to its own conscious plans to achieve its goals.
The mirror surface, as an analogy of the incomprehensible and invisible partition that separates the known world – our beingness - from something else, can give the possibility to model the relationship of a person and the unspeakable, as it seems, otherworldly (transcendental), which reminds the world behind the looking-glass.
Thinkers of former times have believed that such approach is impossible due to inaccessibility of the otherworldly, or transcendental ("thing in itself" of Kant).
But at first it makes sense to find out what is a person from the point of view of technology of perception what we call the environment.
The human body concerning visual perception of the environment reminds a television receiver, combined with a television camera which (eyes) catches the pulse signals going further to the processing centers (the relevant parts of a brain), transformative these signals-packages of information into the moving image.
People believe, apparently, that these signals go from objects which are alien and independent from people, in the form of light reflected from them, in particular, and therefore that all people see same objects before themselves and these objects are not disintegrate in front of them.
Really, so the world is manifested to us, but it would be desirable to learn that is behind this beingness (the manifested).
The science, alas, stopped on the fact of this phenomenon and didn't go further, motivating such approach by lack of possibility of experimental check of what stands behind the manifested.
However independent existence of objects of strictly certain forms, by which they are presented to us, is very doubtful concerning other living beings.
The matter is that beings of different types in own way perceive within their own species the same subject – and concerning its sizes, color, smell, form, permeability and even its existence that is defined by opportunities of a concrete being to transform the arriving signals into the data that is understandable to it from position of usefulness for its vital activity, i.e. into information. This process of receiving and transformation of information into own environment is based on action of sense organs and centers of organism processing information.
For example, if for a person membranes-filters are obviously impassable, for many microbes and bacteria they are absent; the magnetic field, which birds obviously sense and on which they are guided in distant flights, isn't perceived by sense organs of a person at all; apple, solid for a person, is habitat of a worm which it perceives both as food source, and as the atmosphere and as the environment for movement; air a person senses at the fast movement or a wind, and for birds in flight air - the same support, as the earth for us; mold, though slowly, but freely gets through many solid materials, impenetrable for us.
Anyone can give the mass of similar examples which obviously show the fact what the formation of a subject surrounding of the living being depends on its sense organs - their set can increase also a set of objects of beingness for it together with their variety, and can also reduce to an insignificant smallness, as for an earthworm.
Along with that, a person places into the world, perceived by him, other living beings, believing, that for them surrounding is same, as for him.
But it is fair only for living beings with a similar set of sense organs though usual person is confident in the opposite, and thinks that heavens for a dragonfly is manifested with the same color as for him.
This intuitive conviction can't almost be shaken though transparent for some beings is manifested as opaque to others, solid – as soft, dense – as empty, sour – as bitter etc. But people prefer not to think of it.
However, all these collisions point to the fact that the living beings don't get into the ready world of subjects of firmly established forms at all, but in accordance with the means at their disposal (sense organs and the centers processing information) form own reality, combined with the "external" reality formed already by a single consciousness (set of all individual consciousnesses in the form of alive). This process is equivalent to the present time of each living being, which gets to "external" (general) time of single consciousness.
Science does not imagine such ambivalence, it cannot be grasped by common sense, operating exclusively by the one "objective reality", which basically boils down to things, surrounding the person, in this or that foreshortening, with this or that degrees of depth.
If to return to analogy of a person with a television receiver, it should be noted that a person has no the separate external screen monitor on which he could observe both surroundings, and himself from outside. Therefore, at open eyes in front of him has a partial view of the surroundings and own body.
This means that, unlike the TV screen, a person shows himself to himself as if out of himself in action in a real time.
In other words, a person thanks to the sense organs and the processing centers creates not the external picture of some objects, but an internal picture of own life in the corresponding environment in which he is the main character and which he forms.
Therefore, everything that a person sees round himself, is not the external screen image similar television, showing for example, grazed cows on a meadow, but it is some kind of internal screen of the volume image, more exact, for example, the field with the same cows together with himself, and he can act in this "field", combined with him.
The fact, that the space around a person, the "current" time, things (objects of beingness) located next to it are derivatives of the human consciousness with the participation of a single consciousness, more precisely, not producing them from nothing, but forming them initially on the frequency basis of a holographic projection of a timeless infinity (Uniform) from the information packets-pulses, successively coming to the sense organs, which, as you can see, is not difficult to understand if you imagine a person in the form of a television receiver, which is located at one "point," but is able to choose the programs and episodes he needs, finding himself in Africa on excursions, then among the landscapes of his native village.
A person can also remain practically all life in an interior of own room, interspersing this boring life by "marches" for unloved work.
Actually, a person is in own consciousness, or in the localized point of own time ("now") through which his consciousness "carries out" all the desires and ideas in irreversible sequence, trying to carry out them in the conditions of the resisting environment.
It is clear that this analogy leads to idea that not this or that environment comes to a person, but he himself is leading it to himself with assistance of a single consciousness within a global environment which is formed already by all set of individual consciousnesses in the form of the living beings.
In other words, the objects which a person perceives by the sense organs in certain form, are dependent of him, he forms automatically the surroundings and own body into himself - in own processing centers, inasmuch initially the environment is only the high-frequency-information copies of things which "are dissolved" in Uniform, and which are updated by consciousness through sense organs of the living beings.
These copies are converted in each individual consciousness, owing to physiological features of the organism perceiving discrete packages of information without pauses between them, in habitual for us things which move and change just because that only among them and in them and not in the high-frequency wave environment the living beings can abide, change, grow, reproduce and develop.
Thus, all objects of beingness aren't produced by consciousness at all as it is represented to the subjective idealists denying objective existence of matter. Actually, the objects of beingness are formed by any living being, in particular, and a person, more precisely, their consciousness through the sense organs, from quite material high-frequency copies in the form of information packages by converting of incoming pulse signals containing the relevant information into a smooth picture of moving and changing objects of beingness.
Analog of this process is the ordinary TV with that difference that if on the monitor screen, like a human sleep, move only images of things, transformed from pulse radio signals, which aren't a "dense" matter, then in the human consciousness (consciousness of any living being) in the course of consecutive coupling of packages-impulses of information, the waves are converted mainly in the corpuscles, i.e. - into the changing world of things, apparently, according to the principle, close to the principle of the operation of a 3D printer.
Only from where and how this beingness-world for a person occurs?
Look at yourself in a mirror. You recognize yourself only if you have idea of own shape and if you understand that before you a mirror, i.e. the subject reflecting other objects. Otherwise, you will see something unfamiliar and otherworldly, which can frighten you or on which you don't pay attention.
Hence, in order to recognize yourself or any other object, it is necessary to have, first, certain form-building abilities, to know what you're looking for; and, secondly, it is necessary to find into everything that is displayed, for example, in the mirror, the totality of data which will be reduced into consciousness of the specific person in the form what he looks for, for example, in his own shape. Only such procedure can lead to obtaining adequate information by a person, in particular, about oneself in a mirror.
This means that in order to find any object in "the looking-glass noise" it is necessary to present, intuitively or with certain knowledge, the subject of search in a specific form.
However, the signals about any objects deliver to us our sensations: if we are deprived of the opportunity to look at something, we won't see it. If the mole doesn't see the sky, the sun and stars, these objects for it don't exist as owing to absence of appropriate sense organs, and lack of the corresponding form-building abilities. Though, of course, both the sun, and stars and etc. don't disappear anywhere, inasmuch they are formed by a single consciousness, as if covering with them everything various living beings. But the present time of a mole, unlike the present time of the person, with these objects, except a near-surface layer of the earth, directly doesn't contact, though it is in their zone.
In general, in order to get any data, it is necessary first to formulate the object of his desire - consciously or intuitively then refer to where the data can be, and scanning this "field" to identify by available means (sensations in conjunction with centers processing of data, or intellect) required objects which, manifesting as copies in consciousness, are distributed by it in certain order, making the surrounding.
Besides, it isn't enough to see to some living being in a mirror own image, to recognize oneself in this image from all living beings can only a person.
The rest of the living things do not recognize themselves in a mirror, that is, they are not able to identify their own image with themselves as a separate self-made personality, linking this image only with a certain auxiliary object that helps to perform some procedures. At this, only the most developed representatives of the fauna are capable of doing so, such as primates or elephants.
That is, they recognize according to the degree of their own reasonableness only that they identify according to degree of own intelligence what is necessary them to retain of themselves in existence. In other words, these beings live, without understanding themselves, and only sensing, however this ability to sense holds all usual living beings in existence - the living beings don't want to lose own sensations.
It is for this reason only a person, who is aware of himself and able, therefore, to be dissatisfied with himself or the surrounding, is capable to commit suicide, unlike other living beings, always satisfied with life, which give them sensations.
So only a person possesses self-consciousness, whereas these or those sensations (sense organs), this or that degree of rationality (centers processing incoming information) have all living beings, even plants and viruses. So, the main difference of a person from other beings is precisely awareness of oneself, i.e. it consists in separating himself from surroundings and determining himself in it, and not in mind (Descartes) and not in sensations (Hobbes), that respectively in their opinion is the basis of human existence. That is, in addition to the adaptability inherent in all living beings, due to the unambiguity of which they do not even try to go beyond it, remaining dynamic components of their environment, a person acquired, in addition to adaptability, also the ability to design-target activity, which gave him the opportunity, as it were, to get out of the natural framework, for conscious management by this environment.
Only a person thanks to self-consciousness is capable to conscious target selectivity in perception that allows him by the means which are available for him to reach deeper levels of things and the phenomena, getting adequate knowledge about them in each level, i.e. consciously to change surroundings round himself and himself during this process.
If to return to analogy to a mirror then its surface by itself is empty - it is nothingness without the relation to something. But this surface is being filled with this or that content in the form of images, if consumers of this content begin contacting with it, allocating on this surface the familiar forms and skipping the unfamiliar, which their consciousness can't decipher. Then this nothingness represents everything that these consumers can identify in it.
So and timeless, infinite and motionless Uniform responds to the requests of consciousness through the sensations, turning in consciousness out of Nothingness into Everything, which is not Everything in general, but which presents just what consciousness can understand by own means at the moment.
Thus, world behind the looking-glass is some kind of analog not otherworldly, but it is true foundation of beingness, inasmuch only from there (from Uniform through its projection) it is possible to receive Everything, but only it is possible to receive this own Everything, if there is an idea about this Everything, and if there are corresponding the sense organs.
In other words, only in a timeless Uniform can find by scanning the forms, which are clear for consciousness (which it is able to decipher). These forms in the form of copies are manifested in consciousness, becoming for it in a final shape not as information-wave matter, but being converted to "dense" surrounding, known to us.
Automatic union the packages-impulses, more precisely, elimination of pause in the processing centers of the living being, owing to certain inertia of information processing that to some extent is equivalent to a threshold of perception of information packages, between coming consistently of discrete information impulses, ultimately is process of transformation of information into reality of beingness with things, space, motion, smoothly current time.
The living beings can exist, multiply and develop in this beingness, inasmuch wave material formations in the macrocosm, as if surrounding living beings, manifest already mostly properties of corpuscles. At this as analogue of conversion by consciousness wave matter into the corpuscular can be widely used at the present time 3D-printer that converts digital models in a variety of things down to the organic.
Follows from the aforesaid that for all living beings the main thing is not the thinking (rationality), not sensations, but complex process of recognition of objects hidden in a kind of otherworldly Uniform, i.e. the main thing for living beings is obtaining information.
The information process, on which is not capable things because of lack for them of the information processing centers, formative abilities and sense organs, but is capable consciousness in the face of living things, means the presence of time formed in finite durations of gap of infinity, represented by a holographic projection of Uniform.
Converting the high-frequency wave updating structures of a holographic projection through the living beings in "dense" the world means existence of beingness with the moving and changing objects in space and current time.
Inasmuch process of obtaining information is characteristic only for the beings having consciousness, so how inanimate has no relation to process of recognition (identification of objects), insofar beingness is formed by consciousness through the living beings, i.e. neither planets, nor stars, universes, nothing in general without consciousness are not capable to exist.
In summary, we note that a holographic projection is fully being formed, more precisely, updated discretely by a single consciousness which is the set of all kinds of a individual consciousness in the form of the living beings, being converted eventually through this single unit, as a hologram, into the external time, or - into the global beingness, whereas "now" of each individual consciousness is formed by oneself through sensations of own carrier (the body) with the hidden support of a single consciousness on the basis of Uniform, that gives it its own beingness, or rather, own life in the framework of the external time.
In that respect really there is no things without consciousness and consciousness without things, inasmuch things themselves are hidden in timeless Uniform and consciousness in the living updates only what is in its disposal in a holographic projection through which the consciousness in alive recognizes and copies the objects of beingness from Uniform.
Therefore, things and each individual consciousness in this process of updating the holographic projection are connected with a single consciousness, if it, on their basis and on the basis of the passive and active from Uniform, is forming corresponding copies of the objects of beingness and updates by them the previous copies in a holographic projection, but not indissolubly, inasmuch every "moment" of the update makes certain duration behind which through a pause there comes the following updating.
These "ruptures" make time in which the infinite is manifested as the finite infinitely. Otherwise, the information on things and to oneself for consciousness would remain hidden in Uniform, or Uniform wouldn't be manifested in the projection, that means a non-existence for it, but we don't observe this, so how the changing world is open to us.
Thus, it is possible to state: without consciousness there is no matter, and without matter there is no consciousness, but it doesn't mean their sameness – one is the active, another is the passive, but they are merged completely only in Uniform as by the infinite and timeless; and in a holographic projection they exist as the finite infinitely, but discretely, or in faltering time. Thereby, they have the opportunity to be divided in each process of updating of a projection.
The preference of the proposed model of the universe in the form of timeless infinity (Uniform) with its holographic projection over other ideas about the universe, which are closed on its unicity, is also due to the main property of the hologram.
This property of the hologram "all in each part" allows approaching to problem of the organization and the regularity in a new way in essence. The hologram shows that some things in Creation do not give in to research by an analytical method: to dissect any subject and to study its constituents. If we cut something arranged holographically, we will not receive parts of which it consists, and we will receive the same, but it will be less accuracy.
In other words, this property of the hologram "everything in every part" in the framework of the proposed model of Creation implies a deep unity of all objects of beingness.
In particular, if indeed each individual consciousness in any living being coincides with a single consciousness of a holographic projection of Creation, then a single consciousness has the ability partially to control the actions of each individual consciousness in the living, that is, in time, ensuring the life and development of each living being, and together with thereby developing itself.
Each person can check this property on oneself.
If you are completely distracted from the routine, and mentally ask oneself in the face of a single consciousness (the God of time) to direct to a good cause or simply help in it, then a single consciousness will not forget about it.
Thus, in this fluid (continuous) temporal process, before each individual consciousness of a person through his sensations, it becomes possible in the emerging ultimately beingness to separately explore the objects of beingness, digging to their essence, and along with that to live among things and the living beings of various kinds in such a way, as it turns out with the existing level of self-consciousness [5, Chapters 1.2, 1.3].

Bibliography

1. Reale G., Antiseri D. Western philosophy from the origin to the present days. Vol. 1. Saint-Petersburg. “D. Petropolis”. 1994.
2. Berkeley G. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Edited by D.R. Wilkins. Dublin. Reissue 1734. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: www.math.tcd.ie/.../Berkeley/HumanKnowled
3. 1980. David Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, London: Routledge, ISBN 0-7100-0971-2.
4 Kant I. The Critique of Pure Reason. University of Adelaide. 1781/1998. The web edition published by ebooks Adelaide. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: ebooks.adelaide.edu.au > Library. Ebooks
5. Nizovtsev Yu. Everything and nothingness. 2016. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: www.litres.ru or Amazon.